All about investment

By David L Wells

Investing these days has become quite tricky, even treacherous!

There are bad investments all around us on a daily basis. The government seems to have a pretty good handle on bad investments as of late. They are spending $3.6 trillion dollars in the near future on programs we can only hope will help. Oh, by the way, that comes to about $25,573 dollars for each of our 139 million taxpayers. That's ok. Just put it on my bill, or better yet put it on my kids' bill.

Citigroup, for those who do not know, is the nation's largest banking institution. Chances are if you have a credit card or a mortgage, Citigroup is playing a part. Citigroup has been touted as the world's worst investment.

Former Treasury Secretary, Hank Paulson, made a terrible investment on behalf John Q Public. He purchased 7.8% stake in Citigroup for $25 billion dollars. Then he added guarantee's against 90% of future losses on $301 billion dollars in assets. Subsequently, we (taxpayer) injected another $20 billion dollars. So, for paying for about 100% of the market value for Citi, we got less than 1/10th of a company that was worth 1/5th of our investment.

Pretty good deal, eh?

That $45 billion dollar stake has a market value of just over ONE billion today. And, it's about to get worse. The Treasury Department has agreed to convert $25 billion of its preferred stock investment into common stock at Citi. This means the taxpayer's stake will rise to near 40% of Citigroup.

It's just another example of why these insolvent banks should be nationalized or FDIC Mandated, pre-packaged chapter 11, government funded reorganization.

David L. Wells
http://www.apg-llc.us
http://www.debt-negotiation-apg.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=David_L_Wells

By: kelly price

Currency trading education is all about getting the right information but most traders believe myths or base there trading strategies on logic which is not correct and lose. Here we look at some common mistakes, you must avoid to enjoy currency trading success...

One of more of these mistakes are made by the majority of novice traders so lets take a look at them, there in no particular order of importance to avoid - there all important!

1. Forex Robots and Expert Advisors make Money

You have seen them advertised, promising to double your money each month with no effort and all you do is pay a hundred dollars or so for an income for life.

They don't work and if you use one these systems you will lose very quickly. If making money was as easy as the robot vendors claim, no one would work and everyone would trade for a living.

2. Day trading and scalping Work

All short term volatility is random and there is no way you can get the odds on your side and win because of this. Trading short term moves is a loser's game - it looks low risk but you are guaranteed to be wiped out.

3. Markets can be Predicted

Prediction is hoping or guessing and you won't get far doing that in any venture in life and that includes Forex. The far out investment crowd love the theories of Elliot and Fibonacci which claim they can predict the future - but if they can do this, why do they ever get a trade wrong? Never predict, trade the reality of price change and you will have the odds on your side.

4. You can Trade breaking News Stories

News is discounted by the market instantly.

The news itself is not important it's the investor's view of the news which is and everyone may see the same facts but they all draw different conclusions from them. Markets always fall when the market is most bullish and rally when it's most bearish so never trade news stories.

5. Working Hard or Being Clever Guarantees Success

Forex trading suits a simple approach as it's an odds based market. Over complicate your trading and your Forex trading strategy will have to many elements to break. Don't work hard, work smart - effort may make you more money in a normal job but not in Forex.

6. Leverage is the Key to Big Gains

Yes it is but more novice traders wipe themselves out due to over leverage than any other reason. You can get 200:1 leverage with any broker now but novices should start with NO leverage at all, until they are comfortable with there trading and use no more than 10:1 after that.

Work Smart and Win

The above are all common and avoidable mistakes, so if you want to enjoy currency trading success, avoid them and get a good solid currency trading education which is based on sound logic and avoids the myths of Forex.

NEW! 2 X FREE ESSENTIAL TRADER PDFS
ESSENTIAL FOREX TRADING COURSE For free 2 x trading Pdf's, with 50 of pages of essential info on Successful Forex Trading Strategies visit our website at: http://www.learncurrencytradingonline.com

By Thomas Wheelwright

I'm constantly teaching and sharing the concept of building a business around your wealth. What does this mean? Let's start with a little background.

Historically, all great fortunes have been built in business. Whether it was Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, Bill Gates or Warren Buffett, all great fortunes have business as their foundation.

You really don't hear about great fortunes being made by investors. Ever wonder why? It's because business done right provides the most leverage, greatest velocity, and least amount of risk of any money-making activity.

Why do some businesses grow and grow while others seem to hit a ceiling which they can't grow?

The answer to this question lies in the foundation of the business. Small businesses stay small when the owner spends his or her time running the business. Effectively, these people own their job. They have no time to work on the business because they are always working in the business.

The key is how to get the owner out of the business operations and focused on the business growth. The answer is for the business to create a strategy and a set of systems that implement that strategy. Then, and only then, will the business owner have time to grow the business.

When the strategy and systems are in place, the owner only has to manage the systems, not the people. The owner isn't doing the work, the employees and other team members are doing the work.

What does this have to do with investing?

I have discovered that the business principles of strategy and systems can be applied to investing. Investors who create a business of investing, by developing a strategy and implementing systems, can enjoy the same results enjoyed by a successful business owner, i.e., higher profits, more growth, less time spent on investing, total control over their investing and less risk.

Is your investing a business or just a hobby?

Think about your investing. Do you run it like a business? Or, do you run it like a hobby?

Investors who run their investing like a business have:

A clear written strategy

Mission, vision and values

Systems in place to make investing fast, efficient and in line with the strategy

A team of advisors

Reporting to tell them their net worth or cash flow at any given minute

Both informal and formal agreements with their customers and vendors

The list goes on and on. How does your investing activity stack up?

Are you ready to build a business around your wealth?

Historically, all great fortunes have been built in business. Whether it was Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, Bill Gates or Warren Buffett, all great fortunes have business as their foundation. http://www.provisionwealth.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Thomas_Wheelwright

BY:Jose Roncal

The current economic meltdown has changed the face of Wall Street, possibly forever. For decades the energy in the market had been fueled by high-rolling investment bankers, but look what's happened in the last eight months. Lehman Brothers went bankrupt. Bear Stearns was snapped up by JPMorgan Chase, Merrill Lynch got bought out by Bank of America, and Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley had to convert to bank holding companies just to stay in business. Five major investment banks . . .and then there were none.

At the beginning of this year, those five firms had a combined market value of around $250 billion with the top firm, Goldman Sachs, valued at nearly $90 billion. Now the top banks, which are comparatively small boutique firms—Raymond James, Jefferies & Co, Greenhill & Co, Keefe Bruyette & Woods and Piper Jaffray—have a combined market value of $12 billion, a number that has shrunk by a factor of 20.

Essentially, the global economic crisis has ushered in the era of universal banking where massive financial firms offer every conceivable kind of investment product and service. Even smaller brokerage firms face being herded under the umbrellas of big banks, or else risk becoming irrelevant.

Historic Realignment of the Industry

When Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley opted to become bank holding companies it marked an historic realignment of the financial services industry and the end of a securities firm model that had prevailed on Wall Street since the Great Depression. But why did they make the change? Partly because it's given both firms access to the Federal Reserve's discount window — the same line of credit that is open to other depository institutions at a lower interest rate.

As bank holding companies, they can also tap into deposits from retail customers. The two firms had already received a temporary financial lifeline from the Fed—the Primary Dealer Credit Facility—the special reserves established to bail out Wall Street broker-dealers like the Bear Stearns deal in March 2008.

Even though Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now classified as bank holding companies and are part of the universal banking model, they'll still be able to engage in investment banking activities. But after years of loose oversight by the Securities and Exchange Commission, they're now faced with tighter regulations imposed by the Federal Reserve and they are subjected to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation oversight.

The Golden Years of Investment Banking

A quick historical review of investment banks will serve as a backdrop to the events that led to their downfall.

Independent investment banks have been around for a long time, but originally they were small private partnerships that earned most of their money from offering corporate finance and investment advice, as well as some broking and other services. If you had walked into one of their offices and looked around, you might have mistaken it for a large law firm.

The success of their business model depended on the trust built through long-term relationships. There wasn't much money at risk in the early days because the firms operated primarily with the partners' own money. That meant there weren't vast sums available to gamble on risky ventures with excessive leverage. But the lack of working capital and a desire to orchestrate splashier deals, motivated the firms to go public in the late 90s.

The Downfall Begins

With more capital in the coffers and a growing access to low cost, short-term debt, managers started to make larger, riskier capital bets—most recently those troubling and toxic mortgage-backed securities.

The regulations that had once separated investment banks from traditional banks were no longer in place. That opened the way for big global banks like Citigroup and JP Morgan to start competing with Wall Street for what had traditionally been the domain of the investment banking business. This forced Wall Street firms to expand their services, to use more leverage and to take even bigger risks.

When those risks led to profits, the dealmakers were rewarded with outlandish bonuses and the wheels were set in motion for bigger risk-taking. Throw patchy government regulation into the mix and you have, as the saying goes, a recipe for disaster.

Before long, major Wall Street firms were leveraged three or four times more than conventional banks, yet they still operated under far less stringent regulations than the banks.

It wasn't until the financial crisis reared its ugly head in mid-2008 that the U.S. Fed stepped in and for the first time, allowed investment banks access to their discounted funds. Then when the credit crisis hit, highly leveraged Wall Street firms like Bear Stearns and Goldman Sachs found themselves in even deeper trouble. They'd already suffered huge losses with their hedge funds and high-risk ventures, but their excessive leverage compounded their problems as the credit crisis stripped them of the ability to raise the additional capital they needed to survive.

The Outlook for Wall Street

What's the outlook for those working on Wall Street now? No doubt there will be less excitement and no more of the huge bonuses that dealmakers had grown accustomed to. But there are bigger concerns about whether the U.S. will lose its competitive edge and the ability to maintain its power status in the global financial system.

Some of the best and brightest might pull up stakes and head for better opportunities in the burgeoning Asian Markets, or they could flip over to the unregulated Hedge Fund market—at least for as long as those funds manage to survive. Thousands of Hedge Funds are going out of business, bringing serious grief to investors like the huge public pension funds, foundations and endowments that have poured billions of dollars into these private partnerships.

If there is any good news in this economic fiasco, it's this: Main Street stands to eventually benefit from a better regulated Wall Street. With a more transparent financial system, a firmer foundation and a stronger business model, there might be a promising outlook for more stable and consistent growth.

--------

Jose Roncal is co-author of "The Big Gamble: Are You Investing or Speculating" which Donald Trump endorsed as "a great read". Many of the author's articles related to finance and the global economic crisis can be found at http://www.financialspeculation.com